By clicking
Talk to a Specialist, you agree to our
Privacy Policy. You also consent to receive calls and texts, which may be autodialed, from us and our customer communities. Your consent is not a condition to using our service. Please visit our
Terms of Use. for information about our privacy practices.
He also attempted to enact affordable long term care insurance. And maybe not popular with people who want businesses unregulated to do whatever they want, he got new minimum wage and overtime protection for those who work as in home caregivers. This should be important to any caregiver with an aide coming to their home. Don't you want them paid a fair wage and able to get health insurance for themselves? Or do you want them having to work around the clock and while sick around your family member in order to support themsleves. I think it is outrageous (and I'd like any home health care agencies to explain this to me) how they can charge a client 16 per hour and pay the aid 10 per hour, day after day, week after week and not provide any health care benefits, no vacation time, tell them they have to buy their own gloves, they don't get mileage or pay for time traveling between jobs. They are considered independent workers and have to save to make sure they have enough at tax time to pay their taxes b/c the agency doesn't collect govt deductions. They have no unions, they are at the mercy of the "free enterprise system" that the triple Rs promote. and i can see why. The business owner is taking in 6 every hour and providing nothing, except initial placement and screening. Is this really the American way?
President Barack Obama, fresh off a Democratic National Convention in which the turnaround of Michigan's signature auto industry played a central role, heads into the final two months of the campaign with the state's voters solidly behind him.
A poll done by EPIC-MRA of Lansing for the Free Press, WXYZ-TV (Channel 7) and other media partners showed Obama with a commanding 10-percentage-point lead over Michigan-born-and-raised Mitt Romney, whose chances in the state may have been seriously hurt by last week's Democratic convention in Charlotte, N.C.
In an interview with "Tonight Show" host Jay Leno, Romney, a famously cautious campaigner who is occasionally teased for his on-camera stiffness, spent a few minutes cracking jokes before moving to serious back-and-forth over health care overhaul.
When repeatedly pressed by Leno over his plans to repeal President Obama’s health care law, Romney said under his own plan some individuals with pre-existing conditions would be guaranteed coverage.
“As long as you have been continuously insured, you ought to be able to get insurance going forward,” Romney said, but added that security would not be extended to so-called free-riders who only apply for insurance once they fall ill.
“If they are 45 years old and they show up and say I want insurance because I have heart disease, it's like, hey guys - we can't play the game like that,” Romney said.
Life is uncertain and sometimes it is so unfair. That is when we need to carry each other.
When the system is set up so that people can not earn enough to create a tax base that supports the social services we would like to have, local governments go broke and social services erode. That is what we are experiencing.That is the reality in the third world. My friend who lived in Nigeria lives with no fire service. When a house catches fire they get everyone out and let it burn to the ground helplessly. That is not a society I favor.
What hood? that is the most amazing choice of words.. He went to Punaho High School, lived in a lovely high rise with his grandmother the bank vice president. Then he attended three prestigous private colleges.... What "hood" is he from? What hood has he been in to collect these thugs? Such a Alice in Wonderland world we are in right now. I think that hood is called Harvard Law, guess your kin went to Yale.
We, as caregivers, are the epitome of strength. We are better equipped to develop our own strategy and far surpass the ineffective, unprodutive, wasteful "help" a massive bureaucracy would ever deliver.
The Romney ticket is firmly committed to changing medicare and social security, which are not just programs for the aged. Ask anyone with a handicapped child how important these safety net issues are. Many posters here have no safety net for their parents other than social security and Medicare. If these were altered many of us would have pretty insurmountable care giving decisions to make. I am grateful that I was able to secure my pension, as a teacher well enough up to this point in time, that I am confident that I will not end up destitute for taking time to care for my mother. I am grateful for her teachers pension, medicare insurance, and an elderbreak on the house taxes. These are important factors that are allowing me to remain in her home caring for her.
I would encourage people to look at the candidates from the issues that are important to you. For me it is clear that the Obama/Biden Democratic ticket is the most likely agent to allow me to stay in the middle class through this difficult period of my life.
I am grateful that preventive care is free now, so that I can get my mom her flu shots, teeth cleaning and other preventive care seamlessly. I am grateful that when my Cobra runs out, there will be an insurance pool formed in my state for me to choose a carrier to buy insurance from. This is the insurance program, designed by Romney, that was the basis of the National Health Care Initiative passed under Obama. I would like to give Romney credit, but he does not want it.
I hope Mrs Obama's interest in health of children and families and the health and welfare for the vets will translate in efforts to smooth process that we must battle to get our families what they need to thrive.
I am sad that the manufacturing and mill trades that many of our elders were able to work in have moved abroad. That is a huge loss that makes my generation look like a bunch of bums. There is no steel mill to walk into and know you got a job, there is no dock to go join a ship on.
Hourly wages are very depressed right now and perhaps that is a bonus to us as it means we can afford care givers-- if we can afford care givers..... On the other hand I believe it has caused my relatives to de-value what i am contributing.
I believe Mrs. Obama understands what it is like to work full time and care for her parents and her children. She was an extremely successful lawyer before she entered the White House. She surrendered her law degree so that she would not have to do an continuing education while Barrack was in office. She will resume her career when he leaves office.
Joe Biden's wife is a college professor and continues to work full time.
So many of the posts here are "where can I look for help" and generally the answers given a civic offices and agencies. Other people believe those people sitting in our communities on government salaries are "Big Government", but I do not. First off they are people with middle class incomes that are helping my local grocery store stay open and second they are important to create community and support and healthy families.
I am surprised that Mrs Romney has not spoken out about access to health care as she has a chronic disease. I know he has good benefits so possibly it is not a barrier they have experienced.
Most states now have a partnership program that lets people partner with the state for LTC through Medicaid. It is still Medicaid, but if you are a paying partner, then you won't have to spend down in the event you need it. (I never trust the states completely with their programs, which often crumble when they run into financial trouble. We had that happen here with Alabama's college tuition "partnership" program. What a mess!)
One problem that was not popular is that it gave tremendous power to the insurer to contain the cost of healthcare. Hospitals, etc., certainly didn't want that. Another problem is the mountain of paperwork, which is why many doctors don't like dealing with Medicare and Medicaid now.
There were horror stories about the terrible health care in Canada, a country with universal coverage. My friends in Canada couldn't figure out why things were being said. They have the option of having a private doctor if they want, but most go with the free care and have their own doctors. One of my friends from Canada wrote me that he always takes out traveler's insurance when he goes to the USA. He goes to Hawaii every year. He said if he were to become sick when he was here, our system might wipe him out financially. And he is very comfortable financially. Canadians can fear getting sick in the US. I understand. I have BC/BS, but know my copays could still wipe me out if something serious happened.
The cost of medicine is a problem that needs to be dealt with in the US. People stay in jobs they don't like so they won't lose coverage. Unexpected illnesses can put families into bankruptcy. And increasingly, family estates are being totally spent paying healthcare costs. IOW, the healthcare system is winding up with everything in the end.
Sure let us take care of our elders so the government saves on Medicaid.
Then he can hire "more" government. Already in our private business too much. .
Sure let us take care of our elders so the government saves on Medicaid.
Then he can hire "more" government. Already in our private business too. Much.
One question I would ask is what a government can do to make it easier for caregivers.
Sure let us take care of our elders so the government saves on Medicaid.
Then he can hire "more" government. Already in our private business too. Much.
Besides I'm of the mindset that I don't really WANT government "help" (aka--INTERFERENCE!). We need to find solutions ourselves and quit depending upon the government that nearly always fails us!
Regardless of politics, I have heard it said that at some point in everyones life they will become a caregiver, know a caregiver or need to rely on a family member to act as a caregiver. Alzheimers is increasing, people are living longer and the baby boomers are aging.
Maybe the topic should be changed to what is our government doing for caregivers, instead of just the current president. Caregiving is not political, but like many other groups relies on politicians to set national priorities to support our efforts. I wonder what would happen if our politicians passed legislation that would recognize and support what caregivers do and how much we contribute to our families and society.
But to stay on topic, don't hold your breath on the help expected from the annointed one.